Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Greg Sanders's avatar

Sadly, I'll miss this due to a prior engagement, but good sparring partners.

The question I would ask after reading the Post piece if I were there is why visualize world domination? Which is to say "dominance" implies even more brute power than "primacy" without implying the legitimating structures of "hegemony." Thus I don't think it meets the "can" test even before we debate the "should."

My own read is that U.S. hegemony's end could be traced to Liberation day as the President terminated the trade pillars of that structure. I do think that there's a possibility of new forms of hegemony, but I would argue that a strong alliance network supplemented by partnerships grounded in anti-domination would be a far more achievable base. Major Southeast Asian powers like Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, and Thailand may not want to align with the U.S. bloc, but they also don't want to be dominated by China (or any other power). I think it's plausible that even with a robust E.U. this may require U.S. military spending at a notably higher level than Matt Duss would argue for, at least until such a time as global manufacturing becomes less China-centric. Nonetheless, even with present or higher spending levels, seeking to dominate the world with only a quarter of its income and a shrinking portion of its population is neither plausible nor prudent.

Expand full comment
John Wilson's avatar

Totally read that Bernie would be there... then I read some more. I hope it's a good time, Congrats Shadi!

Expand full comment

No posts