In Part 2 of our conversation with Greg Lukianoff, we dive deeper into our nation's perpetual battle over freedom of speech. We examine how the rich and powerful historically viewed unfettered free speech as a threat, yet advocates of speech restrictions today justify them in the name of the weak. Is there any chance of persuading a new generation preoccupied with trigger warnings, microaggressions, and "safetyism"? We also discuss a perhaps more philosophical question: does anyone really support free speech, or do they only support it when it serves their interests?