How come this discerning, this intellectual mind, like this author’s, can believe in the literal meaning of the events described in the Bible, both the Old and New Testaments? It’s an honest and question and I’m not interested in facetious, mocking, or cynical takes.
How come this discerning, this intellectual mind, like this author’s, can believe in the literal meaning of the events described in the Bible, both the Old and New Testaments? It’s an honest and question and I’m not interested in facetious, mocking, or cynical takes.
Also, anyone competent in Christian Apologetics would be able to answer that question for you. Greg Koukl, William Lane Craig, J. P. Moreland, J. Warner Wallace are some of the names that immediately come to mind.
How come this discerning, this intellectual mind, like this author’s, can believe in the literal meaning of the events described in the Bible, both the Old and New Testaments? It’s an honest and question and I’m not interested in facetious, mocking, or cynical takes.
Tara has written a lot about this on her blog. I recommend checking it out! https://open.substack.com/pub/lineofbeauty?r=1e53u&utm_medium=ios
I couldn't actually find any articles that seemed to delve into the particular contours of her belief. Is there a specific post you're thinking of?
Also, anyone competent in Christian Apologetics would be able to answer that question for you. Greg Koukl, William Lane Craig, J. P. Moreland, J. Warner Wallace are some of the names that immediately come to mind.
Also see here:
https://www.google.com/search?q=christian+apologists+who+can+speak+to+the+historicity+of+the+bible
Mk,
This is a good place to start:
https://youtu.be/ocbtjLgUnQY