I disagree with EA, but with this caveat: People need to feel good to continue to give, and EA makes giving fun for a lot of rich people who want to give globally, but it is not morally superior to other types of giving. The best rational for giving is arguably the rational that inspires you to give (arguably), but
I disagree with EA, but with this caveat: People need to feel good to continue to give, and EA makes giving fun for a lot of rich people who want to give globally, but it is not morally superior to other types of giving. The best rational for giving is arguably the rational that inspires you to give (arguably), but
I have a local community volunteer nonprofit, which gives you a background to my perspective, but I believe that the best giving is local. Where else can you see the results directly, and have the most oversight? Yes, we are hard wired to fix the problems in front of us--but I would argue that is a good thing.
I disagree with EA, but with this caveat: People need to feel good to continue to give, and EA makes giving fun for a lot of rich people who want to give globally, but it is not morally superior to other types of giving. The best rational for giving is arguably the rational that inspires you to give (arguably), but
I have a local community volunteer nonprofit, which gives you a background to my perspective, but I believe that the best giving is local. Where else can you see the results directly, and have the most oversight? Yes, we are hard wired to fix the problems in front of us--but I would argue that is a good thing.