Why did you bring this person just so that he and Shadi would spend all the time agreeing with each other, talking over Damir? Where is substantive the disagreement that I expect from Wisdom of Crowds. If I wanted hear consistent BS about racism, I would look at Coates or the Washington Post.
Why did you bring this person just so that he and Shadi would spend all the time agreeing with each other, talking over Damir? Where is substantive the disagreement that I expect from Wisdom of Crowds. If I wanted hear consistent BS about racism, I would look at Coates or the Washington Post.
Why did you bring this person just so that he and Shadi would spend all the time agreeing with each other, talking over Damir? Where is substantive the disagreement that I expect from Wisdom of Crowds. If I wanted hear consistent BS about racism, I would look at Coates or the Washington Post.