My point in the essay was not so much a moral one as much as a psychological one. That a completely rationalized world loses something very human, very important. That at it's core, a world that can be sorted out that way is not going to be fully satisfying. Because in making everything at least potentially explicable, by making claims t…
My point in the essay was not so much a moral one as much as a psychological one. That a completely rationalized world loses something very human, very important. That at it's core, a world that can be sorted out that way is not going to be fully satisfying. Because in making everything at least potentially explicable, by making claims that at the limit mystery will not exist, it desacralizes and banalizes.
My point in the essay was not so much a moral one as much as a psychological one. That a completely rationalized world loses something very human, very important. That at it's core, a world that can be sorted out that way is not going to be fully satisfying. Because in making everything at least potentially explicable, by making claims that at the limit mystery will not exist, it desacralizes and banalizes.